If you were an American law enforcement officer, say a city police officer, sworn to uphold the US Constitution and your state Constitution and to enforce your state’s penal code, and you knew that you would You are hatching a conspiracy to rob a bank in your city, are you preparing to arrest the perpetrators before they rob the bank and cause serious harm to innocent people? Also, if you knew that the perpetrators were known criminals with long criminal histories full of crimes and misdemeanors, would you try to act quickly to prevent the crime from occurring? However, what if your watch commander and even your police chief told you to stand down when you told them the indisputable facts about the impending crime, when it was going to happen, how it was going to happen, and on the specific day? and time? What if, however, they told you it didn’t matter and to forget it?

To answer these poignant questions, I will specifically point to an article that appeared on the front page of the August 2, 2014 issue of the “Washington Post” titled “Obama Prepares Executive Action on Immigration.” This article, from one of the most Marxist-promoting newspapers in the country, flippantly published this excuse for journalism with the same contempt for the US Constitution as when they announced that the big (illegal) bill, Obamacare, would It was on the president’s desk. to sign The article should instead have the correct title, “Obama Plans High Crime to Issue Illegal and Unconstitutional Executive Order Granting Amnesty to Further Denigrate the US Constitution. Why is this so?

Well, the most compelling reason is that executive orders are not mentioned in the US Constitution. They are an abstruse creation of the Supreme Court of the United States. Article 2 in no way gives the president the authority to hold the legislative, executive and judicial powers in one hand and a whip in the other. The President, as chief executive, has only the specific power to issue directives, not laws, that affect only the employment status of employees of the executive branch. He has no power to unilaterally create law (equivalent to a US statute or code), to define and interpret its legal status, and to enforce it. That is the precise definition of pure tyranny.

Remember the infamous executive order issued by the first royal American führer, Franklin D. Roosevelt, when he ordered, in late 1941, that all innocent Japanese Americans be rounded up and imprisoned in internment camps? That order was later ruled unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court, as it should have been before it was issued. That order was responsible for more than 100 deaths in those internment camps and ruined quite a few human lives. Something very terrible, after 1929, happened to most Americans when they were exposed to the severe adversity of a Depression deliberately engineered by the Federal Reserve, in 1927, when it secretly ordered that 1/3 of paper and currency in circulation are gradually withdrawn from circulation (economist Milton Friedman establishes this fact). By 1929, the nation’s savings and loan and bank runs were imminent. Then, when it happened, the people of the United States surrendered to socialism, government regulation, and the philosophies of John Maynard Keynes, which were implemented by FDR in his unconstitutional New Deal. The People gave up their precious freedom to the federal government in exchange for temporary physical safety, thinking that FDR was a savior instead of the demon that he was. There were at that time some American constitutional patriots who fought against Roosevelt, but through FDR’s deceitful conspiracy and collusion, proven through detailed historical research, they lost the fight.

Amazingly, the first executive order was issued by good old President George Washington when he took it upon himself to do the job of Congress by ordering the construction of the first federal mint. Congress should have criticized Washington and told him never to assume a legislative power that rightfully belongs to Congress. However, Washington was not rebuked (it was, for some reason, praised) for its usurpation of the US Constitution, and it was unconstitutionally established that a president has the power to issue “executive orders.” However, the old but true aphorism, “give them an inch, and they’ll take a mile” was exemplified by that fact, and has held truer over the course of history ever since the first illegal order was given.

Now, going back to illegal immigration, there are laws, US codes, that have been approved by plural congresses (Democrats and Republicans) and signed by sitting US presidents, going back to Harry Truman, that make illegal immigration in the United States States, across US borders, a felony and prosecutable by federal police. Under applicable law, any federal law enforcement officer may be involved in the commission of a federal crime, such as bank robbery, kidnapping, shoplifting, and illegal immigration. If he deliberately does not intervene in the robberies or kidnappings, he will not be able to claim, as an excuse for not intervening, that it was not his jurisdiction. This applies to all Federal Law Enforcement Agents, FBI, US Marshall Service, DEA, ATF, etc. For example, if an armed or unarmed US Border Patrol officer or INS (ICE) agent witnesses a DC bank robbery, kidnapping, act of shoplifting, or a illegal immigration act, he or she has the authority to intervene, stop the crime and arrest the perpetrators. If an FBI agent, by chance, witnesses a truckload of illegal aliens from Tijuana, Mexico unloading in Chula Vista, California, he has the jurisdiction to intervene and arrest the aliens and turn them over to the US Border Patrol. This is just as reasonable as a deputy sheriff’s duty to have jurisdiction to enforce any and all state laws in any city in that county where the local police do not witness the crimes being committed. The purpose of law enforcement, federal, state, and local, is to maintain public peace and safety for residents of the States who are United States citizens, through the proper application of all laws, federal, state, and local, legislated and enacted for the public good. When these laws are deliberately not enforced, the peace and security of the People, for which they were intended, diminishes in proportion to the diminution of the law. I believe this is what the Hon. John Adams meant when he solemnly said: “We are a nation of laws, and not of men.”

So, at the beginning of this essay, I asked what you, an American peace officer, would do if you knew that a sordid federal crime, a felony, had been planned and when it was going to take place. If you also knew that federal law enforcement officers, sworn to uphold the US Constitution and enforce all applicable federal laws, were going to stand by and allow the crime to be committed, what would you do? I have some associates who are federal law enforcement, FBI and US Border Patrol, and some associates who are attorneys for the Department of Justice. And you know what? They don’t give a damn if the US president is committing serious crimes; and what a shame! These federal bigwigs are far more interested in maintaining an illegal status quo, to continue receiving their paychecks and retirements, than they are in the rule of law. They all bow to their boss, Eric Holder, and say: “Your command, which is the command of your Führer, is my wish to enforce.” Would you, a sworn peace officer, throw up your hands and say, “There’s nothing I can do?” Or would you do something, maybe something a little drastic?

Of course, what you would have to do is first come to a conclusion as to whether the issuance of an unconstitutional executive order is essentially equivalent to committing a bank robbery, murder, or kidnapping. Let’s go back, for a moment, to FDR and consider a flagrant correlation that cries out for recognition. When that fascist president illegally ordered the internment of more than a million Japanese-Americans, US citizens, and some of those people died during their internment, did that order amount to a felony? Were those deaths the result of manslaughter or murder by Roosevelt’s henchmen? When American citizens suffer directly, to the point of death, through the issuance of unconstitutional executive orders, shouldn’t something drastic be done? Will Obama’s order granting amnesty to illegal aliens, in direct violation of federal law, cause the people of the United States (the residents of his state) to suffer from crime, joblessness, and deliberately engineered social disorder (70 percent of violent crimes in San Diego are committed by Hispanic illegal aliens)? It is my opinion, and forever will be, that when existing federal, state, or local laws are dismissed, denied, ignored, and unenforced by top law enforcement officers and their direct enforcers, lawlessness, which such a system demands, will prevail. , allowing such absence of law, to be abolished and instituted a new system that ensures the benefits of liberty and liberty for the People. This is just the resource declared in that blessed document that was the basis of the American Republican government, the Declaration of Independence.